Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?
Authors
Keywords
Dissonance engineering, Risk analysis, Conflict evaluation, Behavioural conflict, Knowledge evolution
Journal
Cognition Technology & Work
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 1-12
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-02-17
DOI
10.1007/s10111-017-0405-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A rule-based support system for dissonance discovery and control applied to car driving
- (2016) F. Vanderhaegen EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment, and individual differences
- (2015) Lori McCay-Peet et al. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
- Dissonance Engineering: A New Challenge to Analyse Risky Knowledge When using a System
- (2014) Frédéric Vanderhaegen International Journal of Computers Communications & Control
- A2PG: alternative action plan generator
- (2014) W. Ben Yahia et al. Cognition Technology & Work
- Is there still a need for CTW?
- (2014) P. Carlo Cacciabue et al. Cognition Technology & Work
- Using the BCD model for risk analysis: An influence diagram based approach
- (2013) Karima Sedki et al. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Knowledge discovery using genetic algorithm for maritime situational awareness
- (2013) Chun-Hsien Chen et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Iterative learning control based tools to learn from human error
- (2012) Philippe Polet et al. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- How to learn from the resilience of Human–Machine Systems?
- (2012) Kiswendsida Abel Ouedraogo et al. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Cognitive conflict in human–automation interactions: A psychophysiological study
- (2011) Frédéric Dehais et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- A multi-viewpoint system to support abductive reasoning
- (2011) Frédéric Vanderhaegen et al. INFORMATION SCIENCES
- A Benefit/Cost/Deficit (BCD) model for learning from human errors
- (2011) Frédéric Vanderhaegen et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- Cooperation and learning to increase the autonomy of ADAS
- (2011) F. Vanderhaegen Cognition Technology & Work
- Using adjustable autonomy and human–machine cooperation to make a human–machine system resilient – Application to a ground robotic system
- (2010) Stéphane Zieba et al. INFORMATION SCIENCES
- Optimistic and pessimistic decision making with dissonance reduction using interval-valued fuzzy sets
- (2010) Ting-Yu Chen INFORMATION SCIENCES
- Human-error-based design of barriers and analysis of their uses
- (2010) F. Vanderhaegen Cognition Technology & Work
- A reinforced iterative formalism to learn from human errors and uncertainty
- (2009) F. Vanderhaegen et al. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Principles of adjustable autonomy: a framework for resilient human–machine cooperation
- (2009) Stéphane Zieba et al. Cognition Technology & Work
- Smart collaboration between humans and machines based on mutual understanding
- (2008) T. Inagaki ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started