4.6 Article

Generation of reactive cobalt oxo oxamate radical species for biomimetic oxidation of contaminants

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 68, Pages 42875-42883

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra08317c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703201]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ17E030003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-heme oxamate anionic cobalt(III) complexes [CoIII(opbaX)](-) (opbaX = 4-X-ophenylenebis( oxamate), X = H, NO2, CH3) with different substituents were synthesized and applied to targeted micropollutant degradation. Typical radical scavengers (isopropanol and chlorine anions) have no negative effect on the catalytic oxidation of substrates, and no DMPO-cOH or DMPO-cOOH (DMPO = 5,5-dimethyl-pyrroline-oxide) signal was detected by electron paramagnetic resonance spin-trap technique in [CoIII(opbaX)](-)/H2O2 system, suggesting that the non-hydroxyl radical biomimetic catalytic mechanism was dominant in the oxidation process. The results of high-definition ESI-MS pronounced the presence of cobalt-oxo intermediates which played a key role in the catalytic oxidation of substrates. Furthermore, density functional theory calculations were used to evaluate the viability of such cobaltoxo species and it demonstrated an optimizing electromer with a formulation of [CoIV] Oc](-) or [(CoOH)-O-III] c. The calculations explained that the catalytic activity of [CoIII(opbaX)](-) was significantly enhanced by introducing an electron-withdrawing substituent which could change the coordination environment of cobalt to generate more electron-deficient cobalt-oxo species with stronger oxidizing power. This paper made a progress in verifying bio-mimic high oxidation state species and applied it to water purification, which provided deep insight into the properties of transition-metal centers in aqueous catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available