Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Blastocyst vs
cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 583-591
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-10-14
DOI
10.1002/uog.17327
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2016) W.P. Martins et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Dydrogesteronevsprogesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- (2016) M. W. P. Barbosa et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy TEsts: the SEDATE guideline
- (2016) A. Sotiriadis et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
- (2015) Elham Aziminekoo et al. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Effectiveness and safety as outcome measures in reproductive medicine
- (2015) M. Braakhekke et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- GnRH agonist during luteal phase in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- (2015) W. P. Martins et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper
- (2014) Miriam Braakhekke et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- How are neonatal and maternal outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in reproductive medicine?
- (2014) M. Braakhekke et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2014) S. Dar et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
- (2014) S. Fernández-Shaw et al. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
- Blastocyst Transfer Ameliorates Live Birth Rate Compared with Cleavage-Stage Embryos Transfer in FreshIn VitroFertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Shan-Shan Wang et al. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
- Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) Abha Maheshwari et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- A prospective randomised controlled study comparing the cost effectiveness of IVF-ICSI treatment: cleavage stage (day 3) embryo transfer versus extended culture (day 5/6 blastocyst) transfer
- (2013) R. Singh et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates
- (2013) George Kovalevsky et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence
- (2012) Ronit Machtinger et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial
- (2011) Eman A. Elgindy et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers
- (2009) F. Guerif et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started