4.7 Article

Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1051-1058

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep018

Keywords

blastocyst; cleavage-stage embryo; cryopreservation; cumulative delivery rate; single embryo transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whether extended culture allowing selection of embryos with high development potential has any advantage over cleavage-stage embryo transfer remains a matter of debate. Among the currently unsolved questions, the cumulative delivery rate resulting from fresh and frozen embryo transfers needs to be taken into account in both strategies. The aim of our study was, therefore, to compare the efficacy of single embryo transfer either on Day 2 or on Day 5/6 combining fresh and frozen embryo transfers. A prospective study including 478 couples assigned on a voluntary basis to undergo elective single embryo transfer (eSET, n = 243) on Day 2 or single blastocyst transfer (SBT, n = 235) on Day 5/6 was performed. The primary outcome measurement was the cumulative delivery rate including fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in both groups. The delivery rate per cycle following fresh embryo transfer was significantly higher in the SBT group compared with the eSET group (P < 0.01). Conversely, frozen embryo and/or blastocyst transfers tended to result in a higher number of deliveries in the eSET compared with the SBT group. Altogether, the cumulative delivery rate per couple, including fresh and frozen embryo transfers, was similar between the two groups (37.9% versus 34.2% in the SBT and eSET groups, respectively). The observed cumulative delivery rates in this study do not allow us to take a position in favor of SBT or eSET. An improvement in blastocyst cryopreservation may change this attitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available