Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients
Authors
Keywords
Clinical outcomes, Surrogate outcomes, Composite outcomes, Publication bias, Reporting bias, Core outcome sets
Journal
Trials
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-03-14
DOI
10.1186/s13063-017-1870-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Quality of Life, Overall Survival, and Costs of Cancer Drugs Approved Based on Surrogate Endpoints
- (2017) Tracy Rupp et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of regulatory and mortality data
- (2016) Carl J Heneghan et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
- (2016) Amélie Yavchitz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLoS One
- A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis: the reporting and handling of missing data in composite outcomes
- (2016) Fowzia Ibrahim et al. Trials
- Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted toThe BMJ
- (2016) Jennifer Weston et al. BMJ Open
- Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
- (2016) Klaus Lieb et al. BMJ Open
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Assessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document Analysis
- (2016) Jeppe Bennekou Schroll et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
- (2016) Su Golder et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Surrogate outcome markers in research and clinical practice
- (2016) Scott Twaddell Australian Prescriber
- Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance: using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda
- (2015) Sarah Kelly et al. AGE AND AGEING
- Efficacy and Acceptability of Pharmacological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
- (2015) K. Linde et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)
- (2015) Elizabeth Gargon et al. Trials
- Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2015) I. Abraha et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2015) I. Abraha et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Subjective and objective outcomes in randomized clinical trials: definitions differed in methods publications and were often absent from trial reports
- (2014) Helene Moustgaard et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2014) Isabelle Boutron et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries
- (2014) Christine Schmucker et al. PLoS One
- The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
- (2014) Catrin Tudur Smith et al. Trials
- Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
- (2014) P. Saini et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Composite Outcomes in Cardiovascular Research: A Survey of Randomized Trials
- (2013) Eric Lim et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The comet initiative
- (2013) Paula Williamson Trials
- Reporting of industry funded study outcome data: comparison of confidential and published data on the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 for spinal fusion
- (2013) M. A. Rodgers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Completeness of Reporting of Patient-Relevant Clinical Trial Outcomes: Comparison of Unpublished Clinical Study Reports with Publicly Available Data
- (2013) Beate Wieseler et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
- Problems of stopping trials early
- (2012) G. H. Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review
- (2012) E. A. Akl et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities: structured review
- (2012) N. B. King et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Risk factors and interventions with statistically significant tiny effects
- (2011) G. C. Siontis et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Systematic Review of Measures of Clinical Significance Employed in Randomized Controlled Trials of Drugs for Dementia
- (2009) Frank J. Molnar et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
- Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use
- (2009) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started