The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 36, Issue 25, Pages 3923-3934
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-07-27
DOI
10.1002/sim.7411
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis
- (2016) Anna Wiksten et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies
- (2015) Christian Röver et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Misunderstandings aboutQand ‘Cochran'sQtest' in meta-analysis
- (2015) David C. Hoaglin STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis
- (2015) Dan Jackson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
- (2014) Joanna IntHout et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A refined method for multivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression
- (2013) Daniel Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis inside and outside particle physics: convergence using the path of least resistance?
- (2013) Dan Jackson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- (2012) Rebecca M Turner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Estimating common mean and heterogeneity variance in two study case meta-analysis
- (2012) Andrew L. Rukhin STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS
- Meta-analysis inside and outside particle physics: two traditions that should converge?
- (2012) Rose D. Baker et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
- (2011) Jonathan Davey et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections
- (2011) Hisashi Noma STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
- (2009) Dan Jackson et al. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE
- The Significance Level of the Standard Test for a Treatment Effect in Meta-analysis
- (2009) Dan Jackson Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- A re-evaluation of the ‘quantile approximation method’ for random effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Dan Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now