How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?

Published 2009 View Full Article

  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Publication Search
  4. Publication Details
Title
How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE
Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages 961-970
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2009-10-01
DOI
10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.017

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protocol

Community support

Reagent

Community support

Reprint

Contact the author

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More
Webinars Posters Questions Hubs Funding Journals Articles Connect Collections Reviewers About Us FAQs Mobile App Privacy Policy Terms of Use
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.