4.8 Review

Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.034

Keywords

Market efficiency; Economic performance; Efficient markets hypothesis; Carbon trading market; Carbon trading system

Funding

  1. Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation [16JDYJB031]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273088]
  3. Energy Service Company Energy Design and Research Institute of State Grid Corporation [SGJNSJ00SCTS1600079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2014, China proposed medium and long-term low carbon development goals in China-U.S. Joint Statement on Climate Change that the emission of carbon dioxide would reach its peak and the proportion of non-fossil energy accounted for the primary energy consumption would increase to 20% in 2030. In order to achieve these goals, the unified carbon emission trading system should be put into effect by 2017, the implementation of the unified carbon emission trading system depends on the effectiveness of the current carbon trading market in China. On the basis of the effective market theory and fair game model, the unit root test and the run test are developed to analyze the carbon emission market of four representative cities in China. The results show that (1) the carbon trading market in China has only achieved weak efficiency, while the semi strong efficiency and the strong efficiency have not been reached; (2) with the expansion of the market scale, the increase of trading volume, the carbon trading market would converge from the state of inefficiency to weak form efficiency gradually, and the carbon trading market in China shows signs of restoring market efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available