4.8 Review

Sustainability assessment of ethanol production from two crops in Mexico

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 1199-1207

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.035

Keywords

Lifecycle analysis; Greenhouse gases; Sustainability index; Ethanol; Sugarcane; Sorghum

Funding

  1. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico of Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (DGAPA-UNAM) [505002358]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [165518]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First generation ethanol production from two crops, sugarcane and sorghum in four modalities, could be done considering the sustainability level of each modality. We studied two ethanol production modalities from sugarcane, the first from molasses while the second from direct juice; as well as two ethanol production modalities from sorghum, one from a high crop yield and the other from a medium crop yield. To find the modality with the highest sustainability, we developed a sustainability index integrated by six indicators applied in all lifecycle stages of each crop modality considering: greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), land use, water use, energy balance, ethanol production costs and the number of employments generated. We found that sensitivity analysis shows water use is the most sensitive indicator although this sensitivity to the weight factor of each indicator is not large enough to produce significant changes. We also found that production of sugarcane ethanol from direct juice has the highest sustainability index; therefore it would be the most sustainable modality, especially in Mexican regions where abundance of rainwater takes place. It requires 52% less blue water, involves 10.6 times less land use, has 28% less Greenhouse Gas emissions, generates 11% more employments, and its unit costs are 3.5% lower than sugarcane ethanol from molasses -this last one being the current modality Mexico uses to produce ethanol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available