Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1867-1879
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Online
2017-02-15
DOI
10.1017/s0033291717000344
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Early intervention in psychosis: Still the ‘best buy’?
- (2015) David J. Castle et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Self-labelling and stigma as predictors of attitudes towards help-seeking among people at risk of psychosis: 1-year follow-up
- (2015) Ziyan Xu et al. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Stigma- and non-stigma-related treatment barriers to mental healthcare reported by service users and caregivers
- (2015) Lisa Dockery et al. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
- Does stigma impair prevention of mental disorders?
- (2014) Nicolas Rüsch et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Seeking help for first-episode psychosis: a family narrative
- (2014) Charlotte Connor et al. Early Intervention in Psychiatry
- Current Perspectives on Evidence-Based Practices
- (2014) Robert E. Drake PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
- What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
- (2014) S. Clement et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- Is Prevention a Realistic Goal for Schizophrenia?
- (2014) Christian Kohler et al. Current Psychiatry Reports
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of cognitive therapy on internalised stigma in people with at-risk mental states
- (2013) Anthony P. Morrison et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Public Stigma Associated With Psychosis Risk Syndrome in a College Population: Implications for Peer Intervention
- (2013) Lawrence H. Yang et al. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
- Attitudes towards help-seeking and stigma among young people at risk for psychosis
- (2013) Nicolas Rüsch et al. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
- Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) M. R. Stafford et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Youth at ultra high risk for psychosis: using the Revised Network Episode Model to examine pathways to mental health care
- (2012) Katherine M. Boydell et al. Early Intervention in Psychiatry
- Reported stigma and discrimination by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia
- (2011) D. Rose et al. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
- Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: An empirical question
- (2010) Lawrence H. Yang et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V: A risk–benefit analysis
- (2010) Cheryl M. Corcoran et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- The case for including Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome
- (2010) Scott W. Woods et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- Randomized-controlled trials in people at ultra high risk of psychosis: A review of treatment effectiveness
- (2010) Antonio Preti et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- Family-level predictors and correlates of the duration of untreated psychosis in African American first-episode patients
- (2009) Michael T. Compton et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- Schizophrenia, “just the facts” 4. Clinical features and conceptualization
- (2009) Rajiv Tandon et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started