What phytotherapy needs: Evidence-based guidelines for better clinical practice
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What phytotherapy needs: Evidence-based guidelines for better clinical practice
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 413-425
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-11-29
DOI
10.1002/ptr.5977
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Herbal medicinal products – Evidence and tradition from a historical perspective
- (2017) Robert Jütte et al. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
- Evaluation of Benefit and Tolerability of IQP-CL-101 (Xanthofen) in the Symptomatic Improvement of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double-Blinded, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
- (2017) Felix Alt et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Gentiana scabraBunge. Formula for Herpes Zoster: Biological Actions of Key Herbs and Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
- (2017) Kaiyi Wang et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Adjuvant Treatment with Qilin Pill for Men with Oligoasthenospermia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2017) Xin Jin et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Traditional Oriental Herbal Medicine and Natural Killer Cells for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2017) Kyeore Bae et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Panax notoginseng Preparations for Unstable Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2017) Haiying Song et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Polyphenols and Their Role in Obesity Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2017) Grace Farhat et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Efficacy and Safety ofCissus quadrangularisL. in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2017) Ratree Sawangjit et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Herbal hepatotoxicity: Challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods
- (2017) Rolf Teschke et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Are nutraceuticals the modern panacea? From myth to science
- (2016) Pietro Minuz et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Chinese Herbal Medicine for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes
- (2016) Lin Dong et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Role of Medicinal Plants for Liver-Qi Regulation Adjuvant Therapy in Post-stroke Depression: A Systematic Review of Literature
- (2016) Ling-Feng Zeng et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies
- (2016) Angelo A. Izzo et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Effects of Turmeric (Curcuma longa) on Skin Health: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Evidence
- (2016) Alexandra R. Vaughn et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Improving the user experience of patient versions of clinical guidelines: user testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) patient version
- (2015) Naomi Fearns et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- The relevance of pharmacognosy in pharmacological research on herbal medicinal products
- (2015) Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig et al. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
- Review of Clinical Pharmacology ofAloe veraL. in the Treatment of Psoriasis
- (2015) Marco Miroddi et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Can Chinese Herbal Medicine Adjunctive Therapy Improve Outcomes of Senile Vascular Dementia? Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
- (2015) Lingfeng Zeng et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Evidence-Based Phytotherapy in Europe: Where Do We Stand?
- (2015) Robert Fürst et al. PLANTA MEDICA
- What is the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cytisine compared with varenicline for smoking cessation? A systematic review and economic evaluation
- (2014) Joanna Leaviss et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Requirements on efficacy of herbal medicinal products
- (2014) Per Claeson JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
- Efficacy behind activity – Phytotherapeutics are not different from pharmaceuticals
- (2014) Elena Maria Varoni et al. PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY
- Dang Shen[Codonopsis pilosula(Franch.) Nannf] Herbal Formulae for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2014) Johannah L. Shergis et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Proanthocyanin Content in Cranberry CE Medicinal Products
- (2014) Sigrun Chrubasik-Hausmann et al. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
- Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Georgia Salanti et al. PLoS One
- Cranberry and Recurrent Cystitis: More than Marketing?
- (2013) Salvatore Micali et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
- Appraisal Tools for Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review
- (2013) Ulrich Siering et al. PLoS One
- How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
- (2011) Andrea C Tricco et al. BMC Medicine
- Interpreting systematic reviews: are we ready to make our own conclusions? A cross-sectional study
- (2011) Nai Ming Lai et al. BMC Medicine
- How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol
- (2010) Trudy van der Weijden et al. Implementation Science
- Herbal interactions on absorption of drugs: Mechanisms of action and clinical risk assessment
- (2010) Cristiano Colalto PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines
- (2009) J. L. Brożek et al. ALLERGY
- Clinical Trials of Herbal Treatments
- (2009) Ronald B. Turner EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS
- Phytotherapeutics: an evaluation of the potential of 1000 plants
- (2009) G. Cravotto et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS
- Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature
- (2008) S Hakkennes et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started