4.5 Article

Comparative study of the quality characteristics of defatted soy flour treated by supercritical carbon dioxide and organic solvent

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 2485-2493

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-017-2691-8

Keywords

Defatted soy flour; Quality characteristics; Supercritical carbon dioxide; Organic solvent

Funding

  1. Business for Cooperative R&D between Industry, Academy, and Research Institute funded Korea Small and Medium Business Administration [2016-0591]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defatted soy flour is a potential source of food protein, amino acids, ash and isoflavones. The supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and a traditional organic solvent extraction methods were used to remove fat from soy flour, and the quality characteristics of a control soy flour (CSF), defatted soy flour by SC-CO2 (DSFSC-CO2) and defatted soy flour by an organic solvent (DSF-OS) were compared. The SC-CO2 process was carried out at a constant temperature of 45 A degrees C, and a pressure of 40 MPa for 3 h with a CO2 flow rate of 30 g/min. The DSFSC-CO2 had significantly higher protein, ash, and amino acids content than CSF and DSF-OS. The sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis demonstrated that CSF and DSFSC-CO2 had protein bands of similar intensity and area that indicated no denaturation of protein, whereas DSF-OS showed diffuse bands or no bands due to protein denaturation. In addition to higher nutritional value and protein contents, DSFSC-CO2 showed superior functional properties in terms of total soluble solids content, water and oil absorption, emulsifying and foaming capacity. The SC-CO2 method offers a nutritionally and environmentally friendly alternative extraction processing approach for the removal of oil from high-protein food sources. It has a great potential for producing high-protein fat-free, and low-calorie content diet than the traditional organic solvent extraction method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available