Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 97-106
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2017-04-19
DOI
10.1177/1556264617697839
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results
- (2016) Kyle B. Brothers et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Participants and Study Decliners’ Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing
- (2016) Jill Oliver Robinson et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project
- (2015) Saskia C Sanderson et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research
- (2015) Ingrid A. Holm et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results
- (2015) Phoebe L. Bacon et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Public Perceptions of Disease Severity but Not Actionability Correlate with Interest in Receiving Genomic Results: Nonalignment with Current Trends in Practice
- (2015) Kristi D. Graves et al. Public Health Genomics
- An implementation framework for the feedback of individual research results and incidental findings in research
- (2015) Adrian Thorogood et al. BMC Medical Ethics
- Addressing the Ethical Challenges in Genetic Testing and Sequencing of Children
- (2014) Ellen Wright Clayton et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks
- (2014) Jane Kaye et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Clinical utility gene card for: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young
- (2014) Kevin Colclough et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis
- (2014) Juli Murphy Bollinger et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children’s Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board
- (2014) Ingrid A. Holm et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Testing an Online, Dynamic Consent Portal for Large Population Biobank Research
- (2014) Daniel B. Thiel et al. Public Health Genomics
- Parents' Preferences for Return of Results in Pediatric Genomic Research
- (2014) S.I. Ziniel et al. Public Health Genomics
- Return of results in the genomic medicine projects of the eMERGE network
- (2014) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. Frontiers in Genetics
- Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings: Facing the Challenges of Translational Science
- (2013) Susan M. Wolf Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
- Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model
- (2013) Joon-Ho Yu et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children
- (2013) et al. PEDIATRICS
- Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice
- (2012) Kristien Hens et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The beliefs, motivations and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository
- (2012) Erin D. Harris et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study
- (2012) Juli Murphy Bollinger et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets
- (2012) Susan M. Wolf et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance
- (2012) Christian Simon et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments: Figure 1
- (2012) Cara Mand et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Disclosing Individual CDKN2A Research Results to Melanoma Survivors: Interest, Impact, and Demands on Researchers
- (2011) K. D. Christensen et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent
- (2011) Kristien Hens et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time
- (2011) Jonathan S Berg et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Disclosure of individual research results in clinico-genomic trials: challenges, classification and criteria for decision-making
- (2011) R. Kollek et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants
- (2010) Richard R. Fabsitz et al. Circulation-Cardiovascular Genetics
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
- (2008) Paul A. Harris et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started