4.7 Article

Recycling of incinerated sewage sludge ash and cathode ray tube funnel glass in cement mortars

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 142-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.116

Keywords

Cement mortar; Incinerated sewage sludge ash; Cathode ray tubes funnel glass; Pb leaching

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [PolyU 152132/14E]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41602315, 51625903]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  4. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZO15003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the feasibility of using cement blended with ISSA as cementitious materials in the production of cement mortars using recycled CRT glasses as fine aggregates. For comparison purposes, fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) were also used. Fresh and hardened properties of the cement mortars, as well as potential lead (Pb) leaching were investigated. The experimental results showed that the incorporation of ISSA to replace cement reduced the workability, hardened density and compressive strength but increased the water adsorption, drying shrinkage and flexural strength of the mortars. The influence of the different mineral admixtures on the properties of cement mortars was closely related to their pozzolanic activities and water adsorption abilities. ISSA was superior to FA and GGBS in enhancing the flexural strength and reducing Pb leaching of the mortar samples. It is noteworthy that Pb leaching from the mortar samples prepared with both ISSA and CRT glass was greatly reduced and it complied with the local regulatory limits, and increasing the replacement ratio of cement by ISSA led to a corresponding reduction in the Pb leachate concentrations mainly due to the adsorption and precipitation of Pb by ISSA. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available