Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 20-26
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Online
2017-03-16
DOI
10.1590/1678-77572016-0138
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems
- (2015) E. J. N. L. Silva et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) J. Caviedes-Bucheli et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Prospective case controlled clinical study of post-endodontic pain after rotary root canal preparation performed by a single operator
- (2015) Ana Arias et al. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
- Comparison of the Effect of Root Canal Preparation by Using WaveOne and ProTaper on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- (2015) Mohammad H. Nekoofar et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial
- (2014) Surendar Ramamoorthi et al. Australian Endodontic Journal
- Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system
- (2014) Gustavo De-Deus et al. Clinical Oral Investigations
- Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files
- (2014) A. M. Elnaghy INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems
- (2014) M. M. Koçak et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals
- (2014) S. Bürklein et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Reciprocating Versus Rotary Systems for Root Filling Removal: Assessment of the Apically Extruded Material
- (2014) Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Apically Extruded Debris with Reciprocating Single-File and Full-sequence Rotary Instrumentation Systems
- (2012) Sebastian Bürklein et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Success Rate of Single- versus Two-visit Root Canal Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2012) Jorge Paredes-Vieyra et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Pain Prevalence and Severity before, during, and after Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Jaclyn G. Pak et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Postoperative Pain after Manual and Mechanical Glide Path: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- (2011) Damiano Pasqualini et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Comparison of post-obturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial
- (2010) C. Wang et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Healing Rate and Post-obturation Pain of Single- versus Multiple-visit Endodontic Treatment for Infected Root Canals: A Systematic Review
- (2010) Yingying Su et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study
- (2010) Vanessa de Oliveira Alves ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS
- Postoperative Pain in Multiple-visit and Single-visit Root Canal Treatment
- (2009) Abdel Hameed H. ElMubarak et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started