Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 700-705
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-07-15
DOI
10.1111/iej.12503
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc®instruments with various kinematics
- (2015) H. Arslan et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Apical Extrusion of Debris in Flat-oval Root Canals after Using Different Instrumentation Systems
- (2015) Alison Luís Kirchhoff et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Accumulated Hard Tissue Debris Produced during Reciprocating and Rotary Nickel-Titanium Canal Preparation
- (2015) Gustavo De-Deus et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system
- (2014) Gustavo De-Deus et al. Clinical Oral Investigations
- Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files
- (2014) A. M. Elnaghy INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems
- (2014) Y. Üstün et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems
- (2014) M. M. Koçak et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of ProTaper Next Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files
- (2014) Amr M. Elnaghy et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- An In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris and Instrumentation Times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex Instruments
- (2014) Ismail Davut Capar et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Reciprocating Versus Rotary Systems for Root Filling Removal: Assessment of the Apically Extruded Material
- (2014) Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment
- (2013) J. Tanalp et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Self-Adjusting File, Reciprocating Single-file, and 2 Rotary Instrumentation Systems
- (2013) Sibel Koçak et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by the Self-Adjusting File System
- (2013) Gustavo André De-Deus et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Apically Extruded Debris with Reciprocating Single-File and Full-sequence Rotary Instrumentation Systems
- (2012) Sebastian Bürklein et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals
- (2010) V. J. Fornari et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model
- (2010) C. Boutsioukis et al. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
- Effect of Apical Preparation Size and Preparation Taper on Irrigant Volume Delivered by Using Negative Pressure Irrigation System
- (2010) Matthew Brunson et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement
- (2010) Gustavo De-Deus et al. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS
- Homogeneity and adaptation of endodontic fillings in root canals with enlarged apical preparation
- (2009) Ashraf ElAyouti et al. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started