4.8 Article

New Efficient Submodule for a Modular Multilevel Converter in Multiterminal HVDC Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 4258-4278

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2603180

Keywords

Flying capacitor (FC) cell; half- and full-bridge modular multilevel converter; mixed-cell commutation cells; voltage-source converter high-voltage direct-current (VSC-HVDC) transmission systems

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150102368]
  2. SUPERGEN Hubnet project [EP/I013636/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In high-voltage applications, the magnitude of total semiconductor losses (on-state and switching) determines the viability of modular-type multilevel converters. Therefore, this paper presents a new cell arrangement that aims to lower total semiconductor loss of the modular multilevel converter (MMC) to less than that of the half-bridge modular multilevel converter (HB-MMC). Additional attributes of the proposed cell are: it eliminates the protective thyristors used in conventional half-bridge cells that deviate part of the dc-fault current away from the antiparallel diode of the main switch when the converter is blocked during a dc short-circuit fault, and it can facilitate continued operation of the MMC during cell failures without the need for a mechanical bypass switch. Thus, the MMC that uses the proposed cell retains all advantages of the HB-MMC such as full modularity of the power circuit and internal faultmanagement. The claimed attributes of the proposed cell are verified using illustrative simulations and reduced scale experimentations. Additionally, this paper provides brief and critical discussions that highlight the attributes and limitations of popular MMC control methods and different MMC cells structures proposed in the literature, considering the power electronic system perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available