Impact of MLH1 expression on tumor evolution after curative surgical tumor resection in a murine orthotopic xenograft model for human MSI colon cancer
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Impact of MLH1 expression on tumor evolution after curative surgical tumor resection in a murine orthotopic xenograft model for human MSI colon cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 56, Issue 9, Pages 681-690
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-05-17
DOI
10.1002/gcc.22472
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Rational bases for the use of the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in cancer patients
- (2016) Amos Kirilovsky et al. INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
- Immune-Derived PD-L1 Gene Expression Defines a Subgroup of Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer Patients with Favorable Prognosis Who May Be Harmed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- (2016) P. D. Dunne et al. Cancer Immunology Research
- Evaluating Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Xenografts as Preclinical Models by Comparison with Patient Clinical Data
- (2015) M. Nunes et al. CANCER RESEARCH
- A molecular signature for the prediction of recurrence in colorectal cancer
- (2015) Lisha Wang et al. Molecular Cancer
- PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
- (2015) Dung T. Le et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Genomic Classifier ColoPrint Predicts Recurrence in Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients More Accurately Than Clinical Factors
- (2015) S. Kopetz et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
- (2014) Jacques Ferlay et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Independent Validation of a Prognostic Genomic Signature (ColoPrint) for Patients With Stage II Colon Cancer
- (2013) Matthias Maak et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Identification of Candidate Oncogenes in Human Colorectal Cancers With Microsatellite Instability
- (2013) Alexandra E. Gylfe et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Characterization of a Large Panel of Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts Representing the Clinical Heterogeneity of Human Colorectal Cancer
- (2012) S. Julien et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- ColoGuideEx: a robust gene classifier specific for stage II colorectal cancer prognosis
- (2012) Trude H Ågesen et al. GUT
- Integrated Analysis of Molecular and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Stage II/III Colon Cancer
- (2012) A. D. Roth et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development
- (2012) John J. Tentler et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Clinical Value of Prognosis Gene Expression Signatures in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
- (2012) Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona et al. PLoS One
- Defective Mismatch Repair Status as a Prognostic Biomarker of Disease-Free Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy
- (2011) A. Zaanan et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- Restoration of Transforming Growth Factor-β Receptor II Expression in Colon Cancer Cells with Microsatellite Instability Increases Metastatic Potentialin Vivo
- (2011) Xiao-Qiong Liu et al. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
- TGFBR2 and BAX Mononucleotide Tract Mutations, Microsatellite Instability, and Prognosis in 1072 Colorectal Cancers
- (2011) Kaori Shima et al. PLoS One
- A Molecularly Annotated Platform of Patient-Derived Xenografts ("Xenopatients") Identifies HER2 as an Effective Therapeutic Target in Cetuximab-Resistant Colorectal Cancer
- (2011) A. Bertotti et al. Cancer Discovery
- Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: from molecular oncogenic mechanisms to clinical implications
- (2011) Aziz Zaanan et al. CELLULAR ONCOLOGY
- Specific genomic aberrations in primary colorectal cancer are associated with liver metastases
- (2010) Sjoerd C Bruin et al. BMC CANCER
- Defective Mismatch Repair, Microsatellite Mutation Bias, and Variability in Clinical Cancer Phenotypes
- (2010) S. N. Shah et al. CANCER RESEARCH
- Prediction of liver metastasis after colorectal cancer using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of 10 genes
- (2010) Toshiaki Watanabe et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The Chromosomal Instability Pathway in Colon Cancer
- (2010) Maria S. Pino et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer
- (2010) C. Richard Boland et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice
- (2010) C. C. Pritchard et al. GUT
- Gene Expression Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer
- (2010) Ramon Salazar et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer in the era of personalized treatment
- (2010) Madeleine Hewish et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer—the stable evidence
- (2010) Eduardo Vilar et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Impact of p53 expression and microsatellite instability on stage III colon cancer disease-free survival in patients treated by 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin
- (2009) A. Zaanan et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Clinical implications of microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancers
- (2009) Frank A Sinicrope et al. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
- SelTarbase, a database of human mononucleotide-microsatellite mutations and their potential impact to tumorigenesis and immunology
- (2009) Stefan M. Woerner et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Hypermutability of Genes in Homo sapiens Due to the Hosting of Long Mono-SSR
- (2008) E. Loire et al. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
- Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution
- (2008) S. Jones et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started