4.7 Article

Inorganic selenium speciation analysis in Allium and Brassica vegetables by ionic liquid assisted liquid-liquid microextraction with multivariate optimization

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages 102-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.117

Keywords

Selenium; Phosphonium ionic liquid; Liquid-liquid microextraction; Allium; Brassica

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET - Argentina)
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (FonCyT - Argentina) (PICT-BID)
  3. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (UNCuyo - Argentina)
  4. Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly sensitive vortex assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (VA-LLME) method was developed for inorganic Se [Se(IV) and Se(VI)] speciation analysis in Allium and Brassica vegetables. Trihexyl(tetrade cyl)phosphonium decanoate phosphonium ionic liquid (IL) was applied for the extraction of Se(IV)ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (APDC) complex followed by Se determination with electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. A complete optimization of the graphite furnace temperature program was developed for accurate determination of Se in the IL-enriched extracts and multivariate statistical optimization was performed to define the conditions for the highest extraction efficiency. Significant factors of IL-VA-LLME method were sample volume, extraction pH, extraction time and APDC concentration. High extraction efficiency (90%), a 100-fold preconcentration factor and a detection limit of 5.0 ng/L were achieved. The high sensitivity obtained with preconcentration and the non-chromatographic separation of inorganic Se species in complex matrix samples such as garlic, onion, leek, broccoli and cauliflower, are the main advantages of IL-VA-LLME. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available