4.7 Article

Multivariate optimization of simple procedure for determination of Fe and Mg in cassava starch employing slurry sampling and FAAS

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages 41-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.029

Keywords

Slurry sampling; Cassava starch; Magnesium; Iron; Box-Behnken design

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Centro de Microscopia Eletronica (CME-UESC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A slurry sampling procedure has been developed for Fe and Mg determination in cassava starch using flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimization step was performed using a univariate methodology for 200 mg samples and a multivariate methodology, using the Box-Behnken design, for other variables, such as solvent (HNO3:HCl), final concentration (1.7 mol L-1) and time (26 min). This procedure allowed determination of iron and magnesium with detection limits of 1.01 and 3.36 mg kg(-1), respectively. Precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), was of 5.8 and 4.1% (n = 10) for Fe (17.8 mg kg(-1)) and Mg (64.5 mg kg(-1)), respectively. Accuracy was confirmed by analysis of a standard reference material for wheat flour (NIST 1567a), which had certified concentrations of 14.1 +/- 0.5 mg kg(-1) for Fe and 40 +/- 2.0 mg kg(-1) for Mg, and the concentrations found using proposed method were 13.7 +/- 0.3 mg kg(-1) for Fe and 40.8 +/- 1.5 mg kg(-1) for Mg. Comparison with concentrations obtained using closed vessel microwave digestion was also realized. The concentrations obtained varied between 7.85 and 17.8 mg kg(-1) for Fe and 23.7-64.5 mg kg(-1), for Mg. The simplicity, easily, speed and satisfactory analytical characteristics indicate that the proposed analytical procedure is a good alternative for the determination of Fe and Mg in cassava starch samples. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available