Real-world research and the role of observational data in the field of gynaecology – a practical review
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Real-world research and the role of observational data in the field of gynaecology – a practical review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 250-259
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2017-08-18
DOI
10.1080/13625187.2017.1361528
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1.
- (2016) Miguel A. Hernán et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Impact of estrogen type on cardiovascular safety of combined oral contraceptives
- (2016) Jürgen Dinger et al. CONTRACEPTION
- Population-based evaluation of the effectiveness of two regimens for emergency contraception
- (2016) Vivian W.Y. Leung et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Real-World Evidence — What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?
- (2016) Rachel E. Sherman et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
- (2016) Elisa Martín-Merino et al. BMC Womens Health
- Self controlled case series methods: an alternative to standard epidemiological study designs
- (2016) Irene Petersen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Self controlled case series methods: an alternative to standard epidemiological study designs
- (2016) Irene Petersen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Association of Hormonal Contraception With Depression
- (2016) Charlotte Wessel Skovlund et al. JAMA Psychiatry
- The GRACE Checklist: A Validated Assessment Tool for High Quality Observational Studies of Comparative Effectiveness
- (2016) Nancy A. Dreyer et al. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
- Interaction between current vitamin D supplementation and menopausal hormone therapy use on breast cancer risk: evidence from the E3N cohort
- (2015) Claire Cadeau et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
- Maternal vaccination against H1N1 influenza and offspring mortality: population based cohort study and sibling design
- (2015) J. F. Ludvigsson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Maternal vaccination against H1N1 influenza and offspring mortality: population based cohort study and sibling design
- (2015) J. F. Ludvigsson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The continuation rates of long-acting reversible contraceptives in UK general practice using data from The Health Improvement Network
- (2014) Lucía Cea Soriano et al. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
- Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in 1.3 Million Pregnancies: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort
- (2014) Rie Adser Virkus et al. PLoS One
- Oral contraceptive use and mortality after 36 years of follow-up in the Nurses' Health Study: prospective cohort study
- (2014) B. M. Charlton et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Which factors are associated with trainees' confidence in performing obstetric and gynecological ultrasound examinations?
- (2013) M. G. Tolsgaard et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology Methodology: Observational Data
- (2012) Dawn L. Hershman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers in nested case-control studies
- (2011) T. Cai et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Making Observational Studies Count
- (2011) Nancy A. Dreyer EPIDEMIOLOGY
- With Great Data Comes Great Responsibility
- (2011) Miguel A. Hernán EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Guidelines for good database selection and use in pharmacoepidemiology research
- (2011) Gillian C. Hall et al. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
- Using free text information to explore how and when GPs code a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: an observational study using primary care records of patients with ovarian cancer
- (2011) A. R. Tate et al. BMJ Open
- Case validation in research using large databases
- (2010) Luis Alberto García Rodríguez et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
- (2010) Nada F Khan et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Why Observational Studies Should Be Among The Tools Used In Comparative Effectiveness Research
- (2010) Nancy A. Dreyer et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Approaches to Mitigate Bias and Confounding in the Design of Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part II
- (2009) Emily Cox et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Analytic Methods to Improve Causal Inference from Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part III
- (2009) Michael L. Johnson et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part I
- (2009) Marc L. Berger et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion
- (2008) Oskari Heikinheimo et al. CONTRACEPTION
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
- (2008) Erik von Elm et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started