4.7 Article

Soil nitrogen availability indices as predictors of sugarcane nitrogen requirements

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 25-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.004

Keywords

Biofuels; Nitrogen mineralization; Soil nitrogen supply; Relative yield; Nitrogen fertilization

Categories

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2011/07955-0]
  2. FAPESP [2011/14372-1, 2002/10534-8, 2008/56147-1]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [574982/2008-6]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [02/10534-8, 08/56147-1, 11/07955-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen recommendation systems for sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) generally does not consider the N supply from soil. Identifying a reliable soil test for estimating N availability is crucial to avoid yield losses or environmental pollution. Therefore, the objective of this study was to correlate and calibrate N availability indices with field based measures of soil N supply. Between 2006 and 2013, 15 trials for rate-response to N fertilizer by sugarcane ratoons were performed in sao Paulo, the main sugarcane-producing state in Brazil. The following indices were tested: KMnO4 oxidizable C, hot KCl extractable N, phosphate borate buffer distillable N, NaOH distillable N, Illinois Soil N Test, organic C, total N, mineral N, anaerobic incubation, soil respiration, substrate induced respiration, microbial biomass C, metabolic quotient, microbial quotient, and gross N mineralization. The indices were then correlated with sugarcane yield (Y-0N) and N content of the crop (N-0N) in N unfertilized plots, relative yield (RY), and the N rate predicted to achieve 90% of the RY (NR 90%RY). Although weak correlations were found between Y-0N with anaerobic incubation, total N, and soil respiration, as well as between NON and anaerobic incubation, no index correlated with RY or NR 90%RY. Grouping sites based on soil texture or byproduct management did not improve prediction of RY. Therefore, we concluded that none of the fifteen laboratory indices is a reliable predictor of soil N supply, and hence could not be used to adjust N fertilization rate for sugarcane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available