Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 193-205
Publisher
Future Medicine Ltd
Online
2016-03-02
DOI
10.2217/cer-2015-0007
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2015) Neil E. Martin et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Re: Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:460–7
- (2015) Steven MacLennan et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported
- (2015) Valerie Smith et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
- (2015) Theo Vos et al. LANCET
- COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
- (2015) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. Trials
- Core outcome sets and trial registries
- (2015) Mike Clarke et al. Trials
- Recommended Patient-Reported Core Set of Symptoms to Measure in Adult Cancer Treatment Trials
- (2014) B. B. Reeve et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
- (2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al. LANCET
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013
- (2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al. Trials
- Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’
- (2014) Cecilia A C Prinsen et al. Trials
- Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
- (2014) P. Saini et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Current Pharmacologic Treatment of Dementia: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians
- (2013) Amir Qaseem ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine
- (2013) Harold C. Sox ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Toward Patient-Centered Drug Development in Oncology
- (2013) Ethan Basch NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
- (2013) Jamie J Kirkham et al. Trials
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- (2013) A.-W. Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Characteristics of Oncology Clinical Trials
- (2013) Bradford R. Hirsch et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology
- (2012) Ethan Basch et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Getting the Methods Right — The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- (2012) Sherine E. Gabriel et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Content and Quality of 10 000 Controlled Trials in Schizophrenia Over 60 Years
- (2012) Jose Miyar et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key Issues
- (2011) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Early Dialogue Between the Developers of New Technologies and Pricing and Reimbursement Agencies: A Pilot Study
- (2011) Martin E. Backhouse et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies
- (2011) Ian P. Sinha et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
- (2010) Sarah E. Rosenbaum et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
- (2010) Kenneth F. Schulz et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started