4.4 Article

Combination or Differentiation? Two theories of processing order in classification

Journal

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 1-33

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.002

Keywords

Categorization; Category learning; Time pressure; Concurrent load; Holistic; Analytic; Nonanalytic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Does cognition begin with an undifferentiated stimulus whole, which can be divided into distinct attributes if time and cognitive resources allow (Differentiation Theory)? Or does it begin with the attributes, which are combined if time and cognitive resources allow (Combination Theory)? Across psychology, use of the terms analytic and non-analytic imply that Differentiation Theory is correct if cognition begins with the attributes, then synthesis, rather than analysis, is the more appropriate chemical analogy. We re-examined four classic studies of the effects of time pressure, incidental training, and concurrent load on classification and category learning (Kemler Nelson, 1984; Smith & Kemler Nelson, 1984; Smith & Shapiro, 1989; Ward, 1983). These studies are typically interpreted as supporting Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory, while more recent work in classification (Milton et al., 2008, et seq.) supports the opposite conclusion. Across seven experiments, replication and re-analysis of the four classic studies revealed that they do not support Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory two experiments support Combination Theory over Differentiation Theory, and the remainder are compatible with both accounts. We conclude that Combination Theory provides a parsimonious account of both classic and more recent work in this area. The presented data do not require Differentiation Theory, nor a Combination-Differentiation hybrid account. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Psychology, Biological

Initial training with difficult items does not facilitate category learning

C. E. R. Edmunds, Andy J. Wills, Fraser Milton

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2019)

Article Psychology, Biological

Automaticity and cognitive control: Effects of cognitive load on cue-controlled reward choice

Tina Seabrooke, Andy J. Wills, Lee Hogarth, Chris J. Mitchell

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2019)

Article Linguistics

Learning from failure: Errorful generation improves memory for items, not associations

Tina Seabrooke, Timothy J. Hollins, Christopher Kent, Andy J. Wills, Chris J. Mitchell

JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE (2019)

Article Psychology, Biological

Theory Protection in Associative Learning: Humans Maintain Certain Beliefs in a Manner That Violates Prediction Error

Stuart G. Spicer, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Peter M. Jones

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2020)

Article Psychology, Biological

The Effect of Preexposure on Overall Similarity Categorization

Fraser Milton, I. P. L. McLaren, Edward Copestake, David Satherley, Andy J. Wills

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2020)

Article Psychology, Biological

A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning

Andy J. Wills, Lyn Ellett, Fraser Milton, Gareth Croft, Tom Beesley

LEARNING & BEHAVIOR (2020)

Article Psychology

A Cognitive Category-Learning Model of Rule Abstraction, Attention Learning, and Contextual Modulation

Rene Schlegelmilch, Andy J. Wills, Bettina von Helversen

Summary: The Category Abstraction Learning (CAL) model describes category learning through processes of similarity-based generalization and dissimilarity-based abstraction, guided by two attention mechanisms. It explains how rules are learned from scratch and provides explanations for various learning phenomena, challenging existing theories. The model's potential lies in measuring cognitive processes regarding attention, abstraction, error detection, and memorization from multiple psychological perspectives.

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Angus B. Inkster, Timothy J. Hollins

Summary: The research found that guessing the meanings of unknown words can improve later recognition of their meanings compared to studying alone. The error-correction hypothesis suggests that incorrect guesses can promote memory for the meanings when they are revealed. The experiments showed that guessing has a positive impact on target recognition, but not on associative recognition performance.

MEMORY & COGNITION (2022)

Article Neurosciences

Neural correlates of the inverse base rate effect

Angus B. Inkster, Fraser Milton, Charlotte E. R. Edmunds, Abdelmalek Benattayallah, Andy J. Wills

Summary: The inverse base rate effect is a nonrational behavioral phenomenon in which participants preferentially select outcomes that are different from the base rates. Error-driven learning explains this phenomenon, with brain areas associated with prediction error playing a key role.

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING (2022)

Article Psychology, Biological

Theory Protection: Do Humans Protect Existing Associative Links?

Stuart G. Spicer, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Katie L. Blake, Peter M. Jones

Summary: Theories of associative learning often suggest that learning is influenced by prediction error, but a recent study by Spicer et al. proposes that humans are more likely to attribute surprising outcomes to uncertain cues, in order to maintain confident cue-outcome associations. The findings from the study support this theory, and further experiments compare it to other theories and examine the role of inhibition in learning. The results show that participants learned more about cues with larger prediction errors in inhibition-based learning.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Pre-testing effects are target-specific and are not driven by a generalised state of curiosity

Timothy J. Hollins, Tina Seabrooke, Angus Inkster, Andy Wills, Chris J. Mitchell

Summary: Guessing the answer to a question before seeing the answer can improve memory, known as the pre-testing effect. This effect also occurs in general knowledge learning, where people are more likely to remember information they were curious about. However, the pre-testing effect is not consistent with a general state of curiosity.

MEMORY (2023)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Timothy J. Hollins

Summary: Attempting to retrieve answers during an initial test can improve memory, especially for related word pairs, even if the retrieval attempts are unsuccessful. However, such improvement is not observed for unrelated word pairs. The popular theory that the pretesting effect depends on partial activation of the target during the pretesting phase is challenged by the data.

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2021)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Selective effects of errorful generation on recognition memory: the role of motivation and surprise

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Jessica L. Waters, Timothy J. Hollins

MEMORY (2019)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Due Process in Dual Process: Model-Recovery Simulations of Decision-Bound Strategy Analysis in Category Learning

Charlotte E. R. Edmunds, Fraser Milton, Andy J. Wills

COGNITIVE SCIENCE (2018)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Transfer of learned category-response associations is modulated by instruction

Cai S. Longman, Fraser Milton, Andy J. Wills, Frederick Verbruggen

ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2018)

No Data Available