Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
Authors
Keywords
Clinical medicine, Systematic reviews, Reproducibility, Scientific publishing, Meta-analysis, Case series, Bibliometrics, Replication studies
Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages e1002333
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2016-01-05
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data
- (2014) Shanil Ebrahim et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
- (2014) B. Alberts et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- How to Make More Published Research True
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis PLOS MEDICINE
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
- (2014) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- The developmental trajectory of bipolar disorder
- (2013) Anne Duffy et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Financial, nonfinancial and editors' conflicts of interest in high-impact biomedical journals
- (2013) Xavier Bosch et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2–3 year olds
- (2013) Sílvia Costa et al. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
- Two dosing regimens of tosedostat in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (OPAL): a randomised open-label phase 2 study
- (2013) Jorge Cortes et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Expression, Tissue Distribution and Function of miR-21 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- (2013) Nazila Nouraee et al. PLoS One
- Raw data from clinical trials: within reach?
- (2013) Peter Doshi et al. TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- MicroRNA-143 functions as a tumor suppressor in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
- (2012) Yang Ni et al. GENE
- A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
- (2012) Story C. Landis et al. NATURE
- Phase II failures: 2008–2010
- (2011) John Arrowsmith NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Phase III and submission failures: 2007–2010
- (2011) John Arrowsmith NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals
- (2011) Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali et al. PLoS One
- Reproducible Research in Computational Science
- (2011) R. D. Peng SCIENCE
- Disclose all data in publications
- (2010) Keith Baggerly NATURE
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
- (2010) Iain Hrynaszkiewicz et al. Trials
- Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research
- (2009) Reshma Jagsi et al. CANCER
- Combined prolonged-release oxycodone and naloxone improves bowel function in patients receiving opioids for moderate-to-severe non-malignant chronic pain: a randomised controlled trial
- (2009) O Löwenstein et al. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
- Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals
- (2009) Caroline J. Savage et al. PLoS One
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started