4.3 Review

The crosstalk between microRNAs and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 14089-14106

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12923

Keywords

microRNA; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway; cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Youth Science Foundation of China [31601028, 81302151]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M582417]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81172282]
  4. Planned Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen [GJHS20120621142654087, JCYJ20140418095735574, JCYJ20160422170722474]
  5. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQCX20130621101141669]
  6. Key Laboratory Project of Shenzhen [ZDSY20130329101130496]
  7. Medical science and technology research foundation of Guangdong Province [A2016112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mounting evidence has indicated microRNA (miR) dysregulation and the Wnt/ beta-catenin signaling pathway jointly drive carcinogenesis, cancer metastasis, and drug-resistance. The current review will focus on the role of the crosstalk between miRs and the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in cancer development. MiRs were found to activate or inhibit the canonical Wnt pathway at various steps. On the other hand, Wnt activation increases expression of miR by directly binding to its promoter and activating transcription. Moreover, there are mutual feedback loops between some miRs and the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Clinical trials of miR-based therapeutic agents are investigated for solid and hematological tumors, however, challenges concerning low bio availability and possible side effects must be overcome before the final clinical application. This review will describe current understanding of miR crosstalk with the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling cascade. Better understanding of the regulatory network will provide insight into miR-based therapeutic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available