4.8 Article

Targeting antioxidant pathways with ferrocenylated N-heterocyclic carbene supported gold(I) complexes in A549 lung cancer cells

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 1245-1256

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03519h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of the Vice President for Research & Economic Development
  2. Jack N. Averitt College of Graduate Studies
  3. St. Bonaventure University
  4. Keenan-Martine grant
  5. Institute for Basic Science [IBS-R019-D1]
  6. Ministry of Education
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea
  8. National Institutes of Health [CA 68682]
  9. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA068682] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferrocene containing N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligated gold(I) complexes of the type [Au(NHC)(2)](+) were prepared and found to be capable of regulating the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via multiple mechanisms. Single crystal X-ray analysis of bis(1-(ferrocenylmethyl)-3-mesitylimidazol-2-ylidene)-gold(I) chloride (5) and bis(1,3-di(ferrocenylmethyl)imidazol-2-ylidene)-gold(I) chloride (6) revealed a quasi-linear geometry around the gold(I) centers (i.e., the C-Au-C bond angle were measured to be similar to 177 degrees and all the Au-C-carbene bonds distances were in the range of 2.00 (7)-2.03 (1) angstrom). A series of cell studies indicated that cell proliferation inhibition and ROS generation were directly proportional to the amount of ferrocene contained within the [Au(NHC)(2)](+) complexes (IC50 of 6 < 5 < bis(1-benzyl-3-mesitylimidazol-2-ylidene)-gold(I) chloride (4)). Complexes 4-6 were also confirmed to inhibit thioredoxin reductase as inferred from lipoate reduction assays and increased chelatable intracellular zinc concentrations. RNA microarray gene expression assays revealed that 6 induces endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathways as a result of ROS increase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available