Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
Authors
Keywords
Nerve sparing, Innervation, Prostate, Urinary continence
Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 549-565
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-08-02
DOI
10.1007/s00345-016-1901-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update
- (2016) Jochen Walz et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Degree of Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles During Radical Prostatectomy and Urinary Continence 1 Year after Surgery
- (2015) Gunnar Steineck et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles Is Associated with Improved Time to Continence After Radical Prostatectomy But Not Long-term Continence Rates: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2015) Fairleigh Reeves et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Anatomical Study of Pelvic Nerves in Relation to Seminal Vesicles, Prostate and Urethral Sphincter: Immunohistochemical Staining, Computerized Planimetry and 3-Dimensional Reconstruction
- (2015) Roman Ganzer et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Urethral Sphincter Fatigue After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Descriptive Questionnaire-based Study and Anatomic Basis
- (2014) Nobuyuki Hinata et al. UROLOGY
- Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery
- (2012) Nazareno Suardi et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Effect of a Risk-stratified Grade of Nerve-sparing Technique on Early Return of Continence After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
- (2012) Abhishek Srivastava et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- How Can the Autonomic Nervous System Contribute to Urinary Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy? A “Boson-like” Conundrum
- (2012) Declan G. Murphy et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Improving Time to Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Augmentation of the Total Anatomic Reconstruction Technique by Adding Dynamic Detrusor Cuff Trigonoplasty and Suprapubic Tube Placement
- (2012) Ashutosh K. Tewari et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence
- (2012) Harveer S. Dev et al. Nature Reviews Urology
- The impact of cavernosal nerve preservation on continence after robotic radical prostatectomy
- (2011) Donald L. Pick et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Autonomic-somatic communications in the human pelvis: computer-assisted anatomic dissection in male and female fetuses
- (2011) Bayan Alsaid et al. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY
- Neuroanatomy of the male pelvis in respect to radical prostatectomy including three-dimensional visualization
- (2009) Thilo Schwalenberg et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Influence of Nerve-Sparing Procedure on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
- (2009) Atsushi Takenaka et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- The Role of Membranous Urethral Afferent Autonomic Innervation in the Continence Mechanism After Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Clinical and Prospective Study
- (2008) Marcos Vinicius Guarnieri Catarin et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- The Male Urethral Sphincter Complex Revisited: An Anatomical Concept and its Physiological Correlate
- (2008) Mamdouh M. Koraitim JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started