Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
Minimally invasive esophagectomy, Open esophagectomy, Complications, Mortality
Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-12-08
DOI
10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Can Zhou et al. World Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Laparoscopic assisted versus open gastric pull-up following thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A cohort study
- (2015) Hiroyuki Daiko et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
- (2014) Jingpei Li et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma
- (2014) Juha Kauppi et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Predicting blood transfusion in patients undergoing minimally invasive oesophagectomy
- (2014) Crispin Schneider et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
- (2014) Inderpal S. Sarkaria et al. Thoracic Surgery Clinics
- Assessment and Comparison of Recovery after Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: An Exploratory Study in Two Centers
- (2013) R. Parameswaran et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Technical Factors that Affect Anastomotic Integrity Following Esophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2013) Sheraz R. Markar et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Minimally invasive oesophagectomy more expensive than open despite shorter length of stay
- (2013) A. Dhamija et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Efficacy of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization for Esophagectomy: Comparison with Open Thoraco-abdominal Approach
- (2013) Hiroyuki Kitagawa et al. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery
- (2013) M. Jacobs et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Retrospective Study Using the Propensity Score to Clarify the Oncologic Feasibility of Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
- (2013) Shinsuke Takeno et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Abdominal Stage for Esophageal Cancer
- (2012) Hirofumi Ichikawa et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Evidence to Support the Use of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
- (2012) Marc Dantoc et al. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
- Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications
- (2012) N. Briez et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
- (2012) F. Noble et al. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
- Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study†
- (2012) Lucy Bailey et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre
- (2012) S. Sihag et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Extensive Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Optimal Results from a Single Center
- (2012) Yaxing Shen et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy
- (2012) Jeffrey Javidfar et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
- (2012) Surya SAY Biere et al. LANCET
- Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer
- (2012) Kirsten W. Maas et al. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS
- Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications
- (2012) Hironori Tsujimoto et al. SURGERY
- Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review
- (2012) Masayuki Watanabe et al. SURGERY TODAY
- Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?
- (2012) Lesley Uttley et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
- (2012) Erin Schumer et al. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES
- Short-Term Outcomes Following Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer in England
- (2011) Ravikrishna Mamidanna et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- In-Hospital Mortality After a Surgical Resection for Esophageal Cancer: Analyses of the Associated Factors and Historical Changes
- (2011) Masaru Morita et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Global cancer statistics
- (2011) Ahmedin Jemal et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review
- (2011) Marc M. Dantoc et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Comparative analysis of open and hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction
- (2011) Makoto Yamasaki et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Oncologic Efficacy Is Not Compromised, and May Be Improved with Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
- (2011) Adam C. Berger et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Is atrial fibrillation associated with pulmonary embolism?
- (2011) G. GEX et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer
- (2011) Yousuke Kinjo et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction
- (2011) Nick Butler et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience
- (2011) Abhishek Sundaram et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Is There Any Benefit to Incorporating a Laparoscopic Procedure into Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy? The Impact on Perioperative Results in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
- (2011) Jang-Ming Lee et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Evolution and Technique of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
- (2011) Toshitaka Hoppo et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy
- (2010) Thai H. Pham et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Anastomotic Leakage After Esophageal Resection: New Treatment Options by Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy
- (2010) Rolf Weidenhagen et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer
- (2010) P. M. Safranek et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
- (2010) George Sgourakis et al. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
- Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy, a symptom assessment study
- (2010) R. Mehran et al. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
- Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study
- (2010) Sebastian F. Schoppmann et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis
- (2010) Kamal Nagpal et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit
- (2010) Wolfgang Schröder et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by means of endoscopic stent implantation
- (2010) M. Schweigert et al. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
- (2010) Yongshan Gao et al. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer
- (2009) Urs Zingg et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Comparison of Laparoscopic Inversion Esophagectomy and Open Transhiatal Esophagectomy for High-Grade Dysplasia and Stage I Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
- (2009) Kyle A. Perry ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
- Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center
- (2009) Ahmed H. Hamouda et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Comparative Experience of Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagogastric Resection
- (2009) Rajeev Parameswaran et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
- (2008) Arin Kumar Saha et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience
- (2007) T. Fabian et al. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started