The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Drug monitoring, Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions, Literature review, Neoplasms, Self report, Toxicity
Journal
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 3669-3676
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-06-04
DOI
10.1007/s00520-016-3297-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Symptomatic Toxicities Experienced During Anticancer Treatment: Agreement Between Patient and Physician Reporting in Three Randomized Trials
- (2015) Massimo Di Maio et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2015) Amylou C. Dueck et al. JAMA Oncology
- Patients’ self-assessment versus investigators’ evaluation in a phase III trial in non-castrate metastatic prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 15)
- (2014) Gwenaelle Gravis et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2014) E. Basch et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Investigation of a Patient Reported Outcome tool to assess radiotherapy-related toxicity prospectively in patients with lung cancer
- (2014) Marianna Christodoulou et al. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
- Physician-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures in chemotherapy-induced sensory peripheral neurotoxicity: two sides of the same coin
- (2013) P. Alberti et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- New Frontiers in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Adverse Event Reporting, Comparative Effectiveness, and Quality Assessment
- (2013) Ethan Basch Annual Review of Medicine
- Patient- versus physician-reporting of symptoms and health status in chronic myeloid leukemia
- (2013) F. Efficace et al. HAEMATOLOGICA
- Prevalence of Patient-Reported Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Concordance With Clinician Toxicity Assessments in Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
- (2013) A. Tom et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2013) Jennifer L. Hay et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Capturing Acute Toxicity Data During Lung Radiotherapy by Using a Patient-Reported Assessment Tool
- (2012) Brooke Tang et al. Clinical Lung Cancer
- Do clinicians and patients agree regarding symptoms?
- (2012) K. Kirchheiner et al. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
- Impact of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a patient perspective
- (2012) Barbara K. Bennett et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Beyond the FDA PRO Guidance: Steps toward Integrating Meaningful Patient-Reported Outcomes into Regulatory Trials and US Drug Labels
- (2012) Ethan Basch VALUE IN HEALTH
- Patient Self-Reports of Symptoms and Clinician Ratings as Predictors of Overall Cancer Survival
- (2011) Chantal Quinten et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians
- (2011) Thomas M. Atkinson et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Using the Skindex-16 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess rash symptoms: results of a pooled-analysis (N0993)
- (2011) Pamela J. Atherton et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Patient-reported peripheral neuropathy of doxorubicin and cisplatin with and without paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer: Results from GOG 184
- (2010) David Cella et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Comparison of Provider-Assessed and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Acute Skin Toxicity During a Phase III Trial of Mometasone Cream Versus Placebo During Breast Radiotherapy: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4)
- (2010) Michelle A. Neben-Wittich et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008
- (2010) David Cella et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Do Perceptions of Adverse Events Differ Between Patients and Physicians? Findings From a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Radical Treatment for Prostate Cancer
- (2010) E. Andreas Svaboe Steinsvik et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting
- (2010) Ethan Basch NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Toxicity and quality of life outcomes in ovarian cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials
- (2010) Elfriede R. Greimel et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Clinician versus nurse symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute--Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during chemotherapy: results of a comparison based on patient's self-reported questionnaire
- (2009) M. Cirillo et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
- (2009) Ethan Basch et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02
- (2009) Kojiro Shimozuma et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials
- (2008) Carolyn C. Gotay et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started