Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Authors
Keywords
Drug toxicity, Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of results, Qualitative research
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 257-269
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-07-19
DOI
10.1007/s11136-013-0470-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Capturing Acute Toxicity Data During Lung Radiotherapy by Using a Patient-Reported Assessment Tool
- (2012) Brooke Tang et al. Clinical Lung Cancer
- Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes in Drug Safety and Risk Management
- (2012) Anjan K. Banerjee et al. DRUG SAFETY
- Managing symptoms during cancer treatments: evaluating the implementation of evidence-informed remote support protocols
- (2012) Dawn Stacey et al. Implementation Science
- Methodological Standards and Patient-Centeredness in Comparative Effectiveness Research
- (2012) JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Electronic Symptom Reporting Between Patient and Provider for Improved Health Care Service Quality: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Part 1: State of the Art
- (2012) Monika Alise Johansen et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Beyond the FDA PRO Guidance: Steps toward Integrating Meaningful Patient-Reported Outcomes into Regulatory Trials and US Drug Labels
- (2012) Ethan Basch VALUE IN HEALTH
- Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors)
- (2011) L Ashley et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Electronic Toxicity Monitoring and Patient-Reported Outcomes
- (2011) Ethan M. Basch et al. CANCER JOURNAL
- Perspectives of Patients on the Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Cancer Care
- (2011) Hsien Seow et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Patient Self-Reports of Symptoms and Clinician Ratings as Predictors of Overall Cancer Survival
- (2011) Chantal Quinten et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Can We Rely on Patientsʼ Reports of Adverse Events?
- (2011) Junya Zhu et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians
- (2011) Thomas M. Atkinson et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding
- (2011) Donald L. Patrick et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting
- (2010) Ethan Basch NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events
- (2010) A. King et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
- Development of a patient-reported questionnaire for collecting toxicity data following prostate brachytherapy
- (2010) Damian J.J. Farnell et al. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
- Toxicity and quality of life outcomes in ovarian cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials
- (2010) Elfriede R. Greimel et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- How well does the MESTT correlate with CTCAE scale for the grading of dermatological toxicities associated with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors?
- (2010) Alexandre Chan et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions
- (2009) Donald E. Stull et al. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
- Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
- (2009) Ethan Basch et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Multinational Trials—Recommendations on the Translations Required, Approaches to Using the Same Language in Different Countries, and the Approaches to Support Pooling the Data: The ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good Research Practices Task Force Report
- (2008) Diane Wild et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started