4.6 Article

NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR KINETIC EQUATIONS IN THE ANOMALOUS DIFFUSION LIMIT. PART I: THE CASE OF HEAVY-TAILED EQUILIBRIUM

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages A737-A764

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/15M1011366

Keywords

BGK equation; diffusion limit; anomalous diffusion equation; asymptotic preserving scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we propose some numerical schemes for linear kinetic equations in the anomalous diffusion limit. When the equilibrium distribution function is a Maxwellian distribution, it is well known that for an appropriate time scale the small mean free path limit gives rise to a diffusion type equation. However, when a heavy-tailed distribution is considered, another time scale is required and the small mean free path limit leads to a fractional anomalous diffusion equation. Our aim is to develop numerical schemes for the original kinetic model which works for the different regimes, without being restricted by stability conditions of standard explicit time integrators. Starting from some numerical schemes for the diffusion asymptotics, their extension to the anomalous diffusion limit is then studied. In this case, it is crucial to capture the effect of the large velocities of the heavy-tailed equilibrium, so that some important transformations of the schemes derived for the diffusion asymptotics are needed. As a result, we obtain numerical schemes which enjoy the asymptotic preserving property in the anomalous diffusion limit; that is, they do not suffer from the restriction on the time step, and they degenerate towards the fractional diffusion limit when the mean free path goes to zero. We also numerically investigate the uniform accuracy and construct a class of numerical schemes satisfying this property. Finally, the efficiency of the different numerical schemes is shown through numerical experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available