Grant funding: Playing the odds

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

(2016) Ferric C Fang et al.   eLife

A generation at risk: Young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce: Fig. 1.

(2015) Ronald J. Daniels   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?

(2015) D. Li et al.   SCIENCE

Are Random Trading Strategies More Successful than Technical Ones?

(2013) Alessio Emanuele Biondo et al.   PLoS One

Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs

(2011) Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards

(2011) D. K. Ginther et al.   SCIENCE

Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

(2009) Govind Persad et al.   LANCET

Tough Challenges for the Next NIH Director

(2008) Laura Bonetta   CELL

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review

(2008) David Kaplan et al.   PLoS One

Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

(2008) V. E. Johnson   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA