NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise

(2015) Ronald N. Germain   CELL

Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH

(2015) Michael S. Lauer et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores

(2015) Mark D. Lindner et al.   PLoS One

Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?

(2015) D. Li et al.   SCIENCE

NIH's peer review stands up to scrutiny

(2015) J. Mervis   SCIENCE

Percentile Ranking and Citation Impact of a Large Cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Funded Cardiovascular R01 Grants

(2014) Narasimhan Danthi et al.   CIRCULATION RESEARCH

Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices

(2012) Hendy Abdoul et al.   PLoS One

pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves

(2011) Xavier Robin et al.   BMC BIOINFORMATICS

Perspective: Is NIH Funding the “Best Science by the Best Scientists”? A Critique of the NIH R01 Research Grant Review Policies

(2010) Leslie C. Costello   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

NIH Peer Review Reform--Change We Need, or Lipstick on a Pig?

(2009) F. C. Fang et al.   INFECTION AND IMMUNITY

Modeling a century of citation distributions

(2009) Matthew L. Wallace et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review

(2008) David Kaplan et al.   PLoS One

Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

(2008) V. E. Johnson   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA