4.8 Review

Clean, not green: The effective representation of renewable energy

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 1332-1337

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.005

Keywords

Color allegory of RES; Clean energy; Green energy; Color meaning; Renewable energy labeling

Funding

  1. Engineers and Public Constructors Pension Fund of Engineering Schools in Greece (Special Account for Research Funds-Democritus University of Thrace) [2243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The modifiers green and clean and associated color stimuli are used alternatively for describing and illustrating renewable energy sources (RES), an inconsistency that is likely to limit the cumulative impact of diverse efforts to increase public support and consumer preference for RES. Effective descriptive and illustrative materials identify and incorporate stimulus elements that currently evoke relevant consumer behavior due to prior learning histories. The present studies tested the differential intuitive or preestablished meaning of the terms green and clean and their associated colors in representing RES. Children of various ages and adults, from the Thrace region of Greece, chose a color that best represented RES. An unambiguous age-related differentiation was observed: younger children strongly preferred the colors white and yellow and the descriptor clean energy for representing RES, a preference that gradually shifted over age groups to the color green and the descriptor green energy, presumably in accordance with an age-related accumulation in exposure to this form of representation of RES in school curriculum material and in other media. These preliminary findings are interpreted as indicating that the descriptor clean energy and its associated colors might be superior to green energy in terms of its implicit or untrained power to represent RES and evoke relevant consumer behavior. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available