The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature

Title
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
Authors
Keywords
Missing data, Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), Quality of life (QoL), Sensitivity analysis
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1613-1623
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-01-29
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1206-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started