The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
Authors
Keywords
Missing data, Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), Quality of life (QoL), Sensitivity analysis
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1613-1623
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-01-29
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1206-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals
- (2014) Melanie L Bell et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Estimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics: Does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter?
- (2014) Nicola Torrance et al. PAIN
- Multiple imputation to deal with missing EQ-5D-3L data: Should we impute individual domains or the actual index?
- (2014) Claire L. Simons et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- A review of the handling of missing longitudinal outcome data in clinical trials
- (2014) Matthew Powney et al. Trials
- A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
- (2013) Lehana Thabane et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials
- (2013) Melanie Calvert et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensus
- (2013) Tianjing Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer: quality-of-life outcomes from the International Collaboration on Ovarian Neoplasms (ICON7) phase 3 randomised trial
- (2013) Dan Stark et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research
- (2013) Bryce B. Reeve et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare
- (2013) N. Black BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures
- (2012) Amalia Karahalios et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials: An FDA Perspective on the Importance of Dealing With It
- (2012) R T O'Neill et al. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- An investigation of the validity of six measures of physical function in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee
- (2012) Stephen D Gill et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Analysing randomised controlled trials with missing data: Choice of approach affects conclusions
- (2012) Shona Fielding et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Missing Data
- (2012) Iris Eekhout et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials
- (2012) Roderick J. Little et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards
- (2012) Michael Brundage et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- The design and conduct of clinical trials to limit missing data
- (2012) R. J. Little et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Loss to Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials in CKD
- (2011) Aneet Deo et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
- Allowing for missing outcome data and incomplete uptake of randomised interventions, with application to an Internet-based alcohol trial
- (2011) Ian R. White et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Ou
- (2011) Natalie J. Collins et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (A
- (2011) Anna Nilsdotter et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the current state of play
- (2010) Sian Marie Noble et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires. A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey
- (2010) Hugo Peyre et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Last Observation Carried Forward: A Crystal Ball?
- (2009) Michael G. Kenward et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
- (2008) F. J. Molnar et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Simple imputation methods were inadequate for missing not at random (MNAR) quality of life data
- (2008) Shona Fielding et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities
- (2008) Kathleen N. Lohr et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes
- (2008) Shona Fielding et al. Trials
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started