4.7 Article

Failed cooperative, but not competitive, interaction between large-scale brain networks impairs working memory in schizophrenia

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1211-1224

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715002755

Keywords

Default mode network; dynamic interaction; external attention system; schizophrenia; working memory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81401125, 81271485, 81071092, 81561168021, 11101429, 11471081, 81171287, 91230201]
  2. National 973 Program of China [2011CB707800]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110162110017, 20114307120019]
  4. Royal Society
  5. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020507]
  6. key project of the Shanghai Science & Technology Innovation Plan [15JC1400101]
  7. Shanghai Soft Science Research Program [15692106604]
  8. National Centre for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences (NCMIS) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  9. Wellcome Trust [WT/11/096002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background A large-scale network named the default mode network (DMN) dynamically cooperates and competes with an external attention system (EAS) to facilitate various cognitive functioning that is prominently impaired in schizophrenia. However, it is unclear whether the cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is related to the disrupted competition and/or cooperation between these two networks. Method A total of 35 schizophrenia patients and 30 healthy controls were scanned using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging during n-back working memory (WM) processing. Brain activities of the DMN and EAS were measured using general linear modelling of the functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Dynamic interaction between the DMN and EAS was decomposed into two directions using Granger causality analysis. Results We observed a significant failure of DMN suppression in patients with schizophrenia, which was significantly related to WM/attentional deficit. Granger causality modelling showed that in healthy controls, while the EAS inhibitorily influenced the DMN, the DMN exerted an excitatory' or cooperative influence back on the EAS, especially in those with lower WM accuracy. In schizophrenia, this excitatory' DMNEAS influence within the reciprocal EAS-DMN loop was significantly reduced, especially in patients with WM/attentional deficit. Conclusions The dynamic interaction between the DMN and EAS is likely to be comprised of both competitive and cooperative influences. In healthy controls, both the inhibitory' EASDMN interaction and excitatory' DMNEAS interaction are correlated with WM performance. In schizophrenia, reduced cooperative' influence from the DMN to dorsal nodes of the EAS occurs in the context of non-suppression of the DMN and may form a possible pathophysiological substrate of WM deficit and attention disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available