4.3 Article

Response of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen to 15-year Experimental Warming in Two Alpine Habitats (Kobresia Meadow and Potentilla Shrubland) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Journal

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 2305-2313

Publisher

HARD
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/64325

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. '13 th Five-Year' National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0501805]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences strategic project of science and technology [XDA05070200]
  3. Qinghai Province Science and Technology Project [2014-NS-112, 2015-SF-A4-2]
  4. National Key Technology Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology [2012BAD13B01, 2014BAC05B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) has experienced striking warming during the past century, information on how soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) pools of the alpine regions on the QTP respond to long-term warming is scarce. The aims of this study were to assess the response of soil organic C (SOC), total N (TN), labile C and N - including microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), inorganic N (N-inorg), dissolved organic C (DOC), and N (DON) - to 15-year experimental warming in an alpine region (Kobresia meadow and Potentilla scrubland), on the northeastern QTP using open-top chambers (OTCs). Fifteen-year experimental warming had no effect on SOC and TN concentrations and storage at 0-30 cm soil depth, either in Kobresia meadow or Potentilla scrubland habitat, which might be related to the low temperature increase and the unchanged water content. Long-term warming obviously affected soil labile C and N and their contributions to SOC and TN, especially in the meadow habitat, but the values were low, thus the variation of the labile C and N was not enough to influence total C and N storage. The C and N pools were shown to be controlled by different controlling factors, and scrubland was more stable than the meadow ecosystem confronting the change of environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available