4.5 Article

Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework

Journal

MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2268347

Keywords

Student engagement; learning outcomes; medical education; higher education; national survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applies Reeve's four-dimensional student engagement framework to explore the relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in medical education. The results indicate that emotional and cognitive engagement have positive effects on learning outcomes, while behavioral and agentic engagement show negative effects. Furthermore, the gender and national college entrance examination results moderate the relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes.
Introduction This study applies Reeve's four-dimensional student engagement framework to a medical education context to elucidate the relationship between behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic engagement and learning outcomes. Meanwhile, we categorize learning outcomes in knowledge and skills, and added taxonomies to the cognitive education objectives for the knowledge part, including memorization, comprehension, and application.Methods We used the China Medical Student Survey to investigate student engagement, and combined it with the Clinical Medicine Proficiency Test for Medical Schools results as a standardized measurement of learning outcomes. We performed multivariate regression analyses to delve into the effectiveness of different types of student engagement. Moreover, we evaluated the moderating roles of gender and the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE) within the relationships between student engagement and learning outcomes.Results We observed that emotional engagement is most effective in promoting learning outcomes in basic medical knowledge and basic clinical skills. Emotional engagement and cognitive engagement could effectively contribute to learning outcomes in all three aspects of basic medical knowledge. In contrast, behavioral and agentic engagement showed negative effects on learning outcomes. Besides, we found that the results of the NCEE played a positive moderating role.Conclusion This study provides robust evidence for the effectiveness of emotional engagement and cognitive engagement in promoting learning outcomes. Whereas behavioral and agentic engagement may not be good predictors of learning outcomes in macro-level general competence tests. We suggest a combined effort by students and institutions to promote student engagement and bridge the distance between general competency tests and daily learning activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available