A comparison of machine learning methods to find clinical trials for inclusion in new systematic reviews from their PROSPERO registrations prior to searching and screening
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A comparison of machine learning methods to find clinical trials for inclusion in new systematic reviews from their PROSPERO registrations prior to searching and screening
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2023-09-26
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1672
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Accuracy and Efficiency of Machine Learning–Assisted Risk-of-Bias Assessments in “Real-World” Systematic Reviews
- (2022) Anneliese Arno et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reporting of clinical trial safety results in ClinicalTrials.gov for FDA-approved drugs: A cross-sectional analysis
- (2022) Krista Y Chen et al. Clinical Trials
- The automation of relevant trial registration screening for systematic review updates: an evaluation study on a large dataset of ClinicalTrials.gov registrations
- (2021) Didi Surian et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis
- (2020) Shinichi Nakagawa et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution
- A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates
- (2018) Didi Surian et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Improving the Conduct of Systematic Reviews: A Process Mining Perspective
- (2018) Ba’ Pham et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality
- (2018) Michael J. Pianta et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses
- (2018) Richeek Pradhan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort
- (2017) James Thomas et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An exploration of crowdsourcing citation screening for systematic reviews
- (2017) Michael L. Mortensen et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?
- (2016) MATTHEW J. PAGE et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Sharing Individual Participant Data (IPD) within the Context of the Trial Reporting System (TRS)
- (2016) Deborah A. Zarin et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Automatically finding relevant citations for clinical guideline development
- (2015) Duy Duc An Bui et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review
- (2014) Dawid Pieper et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances
- (2014) Alan R Aronson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
- (2014) Julian H. Elliott et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials
- (2013) Vojtech Huser et al. PLoS One
- The automation of systematic reviews
- (2013) G. Tsafnat et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews
- (2010) Byron C Wallace et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications
- (2010) Svetlana Kiritchenko et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started