Is N-Hacking Ever OK? The consequences of collecting more data in pursuit of statistical significance
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is N-Hacking Ever OK? The consequences of collecting more data in pursuit of statistical significance
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages e3002345
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2023-11-01
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002345
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A critique of using the labels confirmatory and exploratory in modern psychological research
- (2022) Ross Jacobucci Frontiers in Psychology
- Large survey finds questionable research practices are common
- (2021) Jop de Vrieze SCIENCE
- Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2021) Yu Xie et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices
- (2020) Samuel V. Bruton et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
- (2020) Stephan Lewandowsky et al. Nature Communications
- Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability
- (2020) Rolf Ulrich et al. eLife
- A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences
- (2019) Stephan Guttinger PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- The Limited Role of Formal Statistical Inference in Scientific Inference
- (2019) Raymond Hubbard et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Assessing the Efficacy of a Training Intervention to Reduce Acceptance of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology Graduate Students
- (2019) Donald F. Sacco et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- The problem with unadjusted multiple and sequential statistical testing
- (2019) Casper Albers Nature Communications
- Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity
- (2019) Berna Devezer et al. PLoS One
- Statistical Analysis Must Improve to Address the Reproducibility Crisis: The ACcess to Transparent Statistics (ACTS) Call to Action
- (2019) Romain‐Daniel Gosselin BIOESSAYS
- Replications Everywhere
- (2018) Stephan Guttinger BIOESSAYS
- Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
- (2018) Hannah Fraser et al. PLoS One
- What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments?
- (2018) Stanley E. Lazic et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Statistical mistakes and how to avoid them – lessons learned from the reproducibility crisis
- (2018) A. Turkiewicz et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics
- (2014) Harvey J. Motulsky NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
- An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
- (2014) D. Colquhoun Royal Society Open Science
- Statistical inference for exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics
- (2009) A. Buja et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More