Magnitude decrease of the Matthew effect in citations: a study based on Nobel Prize articles
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Magnitude decrease of the Matthew effect in citations: a study based on Nobel Prize articles
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2023-11-04
DOI
10.1007/s11192-023-04874-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?
- (2022) Xian Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited
- (2022) Misha Teplitskiy et al. RESEARCH POLICY
- Explaining abnormal returns in stock markets: An alpha-neutral version of the CAPM
- (2022) Francesco Rocciolo et al. International Review of Financial Analysis
- Revisiting the disruptive index: evidence from the Nobel Prize-winning articles
- (2022) Guoqiang Liang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How do Price medalists’ scholarly impact change before and after their awards?
- (2021) Jianhua Hou et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Using the catastrophe theory to discover transformative research topics
- (2021) Haiyun Xu et al. RESEARCH EVALUATION
- Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact
- (2020) Jichao Li et al. Journal of the Royal Society Interface
- Diffusion and adoption: an explanatory model of “question mark” and “rising star” articles
- (2020) Guoqiang Liang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The Gene of Scientific Success
- (2020) Xiangjie Kong et al. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
- Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country
- (2020) Guoqiang Liang et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates
- (2019) Jichao Li et al. Scientific Data
- Qualifying threshold of “take-off” stage for successfully disseminated creative ideas
- (2019) Guoqiang Liang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal
- (2019) Barbara McGillivray et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Early-career setback and future career impact
- (2019) Yang Wang et al. Nature Communications
- Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations
- (2018) Chao Min et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Toward a more scientific science
- (2018) Pierre Azoulay et al. SCIENCE
- Relation of early career performance and recognition to the probability of winning the Nobel Prize in economics
- (2017) Ho F. Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle
- (2017) Fred Y. Ye et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Nobel Prize winners 2016: Igniting or sparking foundational publications?
- (2016) Xiaojun Hu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications
- (2016) Xiaojun Hu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Sleeping beauties in genius work: When were they awakened?
- (2015) Jiang Li et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize
- (2013) Tove Faber Frandsen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Matthew: Effect or Fable?
- (2013) Pierre Azoulay et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Correlations between bibliometrics and peer evaluation for all disciplines: the evaluation of Brazilian scientists
- (2013) Jacques Wainer et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime?
- (2012) Xianwen Wang et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective
- (2011) Massimo Franceschet et al. Journal of Informetrics
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now