COVID‐19 rapid antigen tests approved for self‐testing in Australia: published diagnostic test accuracy studies and manufacturer‐supplied information. A systematic review
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
COVID‐19 rapid antigen tests approved for self‐testing in Australia: published diagnostic test accuracy studies and manufacturer‐supplied information. A systematic review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2023-10-31
DOI
10.5694/mja2.52151
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Diagnostic performance, user acceptability, and safety of unsupervised SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detecting tests performed at home
- (2022) Ida Johanne B. Møller et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors
- (2022) Lukas E. Brümmer et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
- (2022) Neal R. Haddaway et al. Campbell Systematic Reviews
- The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications
- (2022) Robyn Butcher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Investigating the Sensitivity of Nasal or Throat Swabs: Combination of Both Swabs Increases the Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests
- (2022) Barbara L. Goodall et al. Microbiology Spectrum
- Head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of saliva and nasal rapid antigen SARS-CoV-2 self-testing: cross-sectional study
- (2022) Ewoud Schuit et al. BMC Medicine
- Evaluation of Saliva as a Matrix for RT-PCR Analysis and Two Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
- (2022) Julie De Meyer et al. Viruses-Basel
- Diagnostic accuracy of covid-19 rapid antigen tests with unsupervised self-sampling in people with symptoms in the omicron period: cross sectional study
- (2022) Ewoud Schuit et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparison of BinaxNOW and SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR Detection of the Omicron Variant from Matched Anterior Nares Swabs
- (2022) Lena Landaverde et al. Microbiology Spectrum
- How to use imperfect tests for COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV‐2) to make clinical decisions
- (2021) Katy JL Bell et al. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020
- (2021) Melisa M Shah et al. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Guidance for the design and reporting of studies evaluating the clinical performance of tests for present or past SARS-CoV-2 infection
- (2021) Jenny A Doust et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community
- (2021) Joep J.J.M. Stohr et al. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
- Secondary electronic sources demonstrated very good sensitivity for identifying studies evaluating interventions for COVID-19.
- (2021) O Pierre et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test
- (2021) Julian A. F. Klein et al. MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
- Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments
- (2020) Luke A. McGuinness et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
- (2015) Patrick M Bossuyt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
- (2015) Patrick M Bossuyt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started