Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 61-71
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-12-17
DOI
10.1111/medu.13130
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Linking Simulation-Based Educational Assessments and Patient-Related Outcomes
- (2015) Ryan Brydges et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods
- (2015) David A. Cook et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment
- (2015) Jonathan S Ilgen et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Trial-Results Reporting and Academic Medical Centers
- (2015) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The Proposed Rule for U.S. Clinical Trial Registration and Results Submission
- (2015) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- CONSORT Item Reporting Quality in the Top Ten Ranked Journals of Critical Care Medicine in 2011: A Retrospective Analysis
- (2015) Ana Stevanovic et al. PLoS One
- Challenges of synthesizing medical education research
- (2014) Rachel H Ellaway BMC Medicine
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Evaluative Medical Education Studies
- (2013) Margaret Sampson et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Technology-Enhanced Simulation to Assess Health Professionals
- (2013) David A. Cook et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment
- (2013) David A. Cook et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Isabelle Boutron et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials
- (2013) Kenneth F. Schulz ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
- (2013) Gilda Piaggio et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Publications
- (2013) Sean P. Grant et al. PLoS One
- Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs
- (2012) Lisa Hartling et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
- (2012) M. K. Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation
- (2011) Irene W. Y. Ma et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals
- (2011) N. R. Parsons et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
- Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review
- (2011) David A Cook et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started