Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages e2317651
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Online
2023-06-09
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17651
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The SPIRIT Checklist—lessons from the experience of SPIRIT protocol editors
- (2022) Riaz Qureshi et al. Trials
- Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)
- (2022) Dmitry Gryaznov et al. BMJ Open
- A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study
- (2022) Benjamin Speich et al. Trials
- Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
- (2020) David Blanco et al. BMJ Open
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- (2020) Benjamin Speich et al. BMJ Open
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- (2019) David Blanco et al. BMJ Open
- Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
- (2016) Sally Hopewell et al. BMC Medicine
- A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
- (2016) Douglas G Altman et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Where do peer reviewers come from?
- (2014) L. Citrome INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols
- (2014) Derek Kyte et al. PLoS One
- Writing a research article that is “fit for purpose”: EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines
- (2013) Iveta Simera ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
- (2013) An-Wen Chan et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- (2013) A.-W. Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
- (2010) Iveta Simera et al. BMC Medicine
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
- (2010) Kenneth F. Schulz et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started