A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 67-77
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2016-02-16
DOI
10.1177/0141076815625599
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
- (2015) Karel G.M. Moons et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Caroline Barnes et al. BMC Medicine
- Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology
- (2015) Suzanne E. Mahady et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD
- (2015) Daniël A. Korevaar et al. RADIOLOGY
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement
- (2015) S. Vohra et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement
- (2015) S. Vohra et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
- (2014) S. Hopewell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
- (2013) Gilda Piaggio et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals
- (2012) Nick R Parsons et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration
- (2012) Douglas G Altman et al. BMC Medicine
- Lies, damn lies and statistics: Errors and omission in papers submitted to INJURY 2010–2012
- (2012) Robin J. Prescott et al. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
- (2012) M. K. Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
- (2011) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
- (2011) Sander Nieuwenhuis et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials
- (2011) Sally Hopewell et al. Trials
- Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed
- (2010) Agnes Dechartres et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2010) J. M. Sargeant et al. Zoonoses and Public Health
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
- (2010) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
- (2010) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. LANCET
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors
- (2008) Iveta Simera et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started