4.6 Article

Microcalorimetry Study of the Adsorption of Asphaltenes and Asphaltene Model Compounds at the Liquid-Solid Surface

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 32, Issue 29, Pages 7294-7305

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00816

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council [234112]
  2. AkzoNobel
  3. BP
  4. Canada Natural Resources
  5. Nalco-Champion
  6. Petrobras
  7. Statoil Norge AS
  8. Total EP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adsorption of an acidic polyaromatic asphaltene model compound (CSPeC11) and indigenous C-6-asphaltenes onto the liquid-solid surface is studied. Model compound CSPeC11 exhibits a similar type of adsorption with a plateau adsorbed amount as C-6-asphaltenes onto three surfaces (silica, calcite, and stainless steel). Model compound BisAC11, with aliphatic end groups and no acidic functionality, does not adsorb at the liquid silica surface, indicating the importance of polar interactions on adsorption. The values of the adsorption enthalpy characterized by the Delta H-z parameter (the enthalpy at zero coverage) indicate that the type of adsorption and the driving force depend on the surface, a key feature when discussing asphaltene deposition. The adsorption of CSPeC11 onto silica is shown to be driven primarily by H bonding (Delta H-z = 34.9 kJ/mol), unlike adsorption onto calcite where polar van der Waals and acidic/basic interactions are thought to be predominant (Delta H-z = -23.5 kJ/mol). Interactions between CSPeC11 and stainless steel are found to be weak (Delta H-z = -7.7 kJ/mol). Comparing C-6-asphaltenes and their esterified counterpart shows that adsorption at the liquid-solid surface is not influenced by the formation of H bonds. This was evidenced by the similar adsorbed amounts obtained. Finally, CSPeC11 captures, to a certain extent, the adsorption interactions of asphaltenes present at the calcite-oil and stainless steel-oil surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available