4.7 Article

Evolution of anisotropy in hierarchical porous ceramics during sinter-forging

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 2937-2945

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.12.042

Keywords

Anisotropy; Grain growth; Densification; Sinter forging; Porous ceramics

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems and Manufacturing Innovations (NSF) [CMMI 1502392, CMMI 1234114]
  2. Saint-Gobain Ceramics Plastics Inc.
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1234114] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1502392] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When a body is sintered under non-hydrostatic stress (or strain) fields, anisotropic microstructures may develop which would have an impact on the performance of sintered products. In this study, we focus on the development of pore shape anisotropy during sintering forging. Several parameters were used to characterize the anisotropy of both intrinsic (small inter-particle pores) and extrinsic (large pores from the burnout of pore-formers). The effect of applied stress on grain growth was also investigated. As expected during sinter forging, the pore shape becomes anisotropic and the pores orient preferentially. The intrinsic pores preferentially align parallel while the extrinsic pores align perpendicular to the applied stress. For both intrinsic and extrinsic pores, the degree of anisotropy increases with applied stress, reaches a maximum and then decreases with further increase in stress. Applied stress leads to finer grain microstructures at a particular density. Possible explanations are proposed to explain these observations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available