4.8 Review

FRET as the tool for in vivo nanomedicine tracking

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 349, Issue -, Pages 156-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.048

Keywords

FRET; Pharmacokinetics; Nanomedicine; In vivo fluorescence imaging; Confocal microscopy

Funding

  1. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  2. Maine -et-Loire Committee (49) , Angers, France [JPB/FP - 223/12.2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced drug delivery system using nanocarriers is a major application of nanotechnology in pharmacotherapeutics. However, the clinical translation of nanomedicine faces challenges, and this review focuses on utilizing Fo•rster resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a method to track intact nanocarriers in vivo for studying pharmacokinetics.
Advanced drug delivery system utilizing a nanocarrier is the major application of nanotechnology on pharmacotherapeutics. However, despite the promising benefits and a leading trend in pharmaceutical research, nanomedicine development suffers from a poor clinical translation problem as only a handful of nanomedicine products reach the market yearly. The conventional pharmacokinetic study generally focuses only on monitoring the level of a free drug but ignores the nanocarrier's role in pharmacokinetics. One hurdle is that it is difficult to directly track intact nanocarriers in vivo to explore their pharmacokinetics. Although several imaging techniques such as radiolabeling, nuclear imaging, fluorescence imaging, etc., have been developed over the past few years, currently, one method that can successfully track the intact nanocarriers in vivo directly is by Fo center dot rster resonance energy transfer (FRET). This review summarizes the application of FRET as the in vivo nanoparticle tracker for studying the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the organic nanocarriers and gives elaborative details on the techniques utilized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available