4.7 Review

Nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines in the global food supply

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2124949

Keywords

Database; dietary assessment; nitrate; nitrite; nitrosamines; systematic review

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a reference database to estimate the levels of nitrate, nitrite, and nitrosamines in the global food supply, which can be used by researchers and practitioners to confidently estimate dietary intake and investigate associations with health outcomes and exercise performance.
Inorganic nitrate provided by either nitrate salts or food supplements may improve cardiometabolic health. However, current methods to assess dietary nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamine consumption are inadequate. The purpose of this study was to develop a reference database to estimate the levels of nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines in the global food supply. A systematic literature search was undertaken; of the 5,747 articles screened, 448 met the inclusion criteria. The final database included data for 1,980 food and beverages from 65 different countries. There were 5,105 unique records for nitrate, 2,707 for nitrite, and 954 for nitrosamine. For ease of use, data were sorted into 12 categories; regarding nitrate and nitrite concentrations in food and beverages, 'vegetables and herbs' were most reported in the literature (n = 3,268 and n = 1,200, respectively). For nitrosamines, 'protein foods of animal origin' were most reported (n = 398 records). This database will allow researchers and practitioners to confidently estimate dietary intake of nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines. When paired with health data, our database can be used to investigate associations between nitrate intake and health outcomes, and/or exercise performance and could support the development of key dietary nitrate intake guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available